On January 13, 2012, the FTC issued proposed amendments to Parts 2 and 4 of its Rules of Practice (“Rules”). Written comments must be received by March 23, 2012.
Continue reading "FTC to Revise Investigatory Rules, Attorney Disciplinary Rules" »
In an initial decision issued on January 5, 2012, FTC Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell ordered ProMedica Health System Inc to divest recently-acquired St. Luke’s Hospital to an FTC-approved buyer within 180 days after the order becomes final. See http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9346/120105promedicadecision.pdf
Continue reading "Promedica Health System Ordered to Divest St. Luke's Hospital" »
In June 2009, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “the Commission”) authorized the staff to conduct an investigation to determine whether Church & Dwight was using exclusionary practices such as conditioning discounts or rebates to retailers on the percentage of shelf or display space dedicated to Trojan brand condoms and “other products” sold and distributed by Church & Dwight.
Continue reading "D.C. Circuit Gives FTC Broad Discovery Rights " »
On November 21, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) settled allegations of violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45 (“FTC Act”) against Pool Corporation (“PoolCorp”). PoolCorp and the FTC reached a proposed consent agreement resolving charges that PoolCorp used exclusionary acts and practices to maintain its monopoly power in the pool product distribution market in violation of Section 5.
Continue reading "FTC Settles With Pool Supplier Regarding Exclusive Dealing Practices" »
In light of the Department of Justice’s attempt to block telecom giant, AT&T from acquiring T-Mobile, the Hudson Institute recently released a report discussing antitrust policy as it applies to the growth of innovation. See Irwin Stelzer, Antitrust Policy in an Age of Rapid Innovation, BRIEFING PAPER (Hudson Inst., Washington, D.C.) Oct. 2011.
Continue reading "Hudson Institute’s Antitrust Policy in an Age of Rapid Innovation" »
On September 23, 2011, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a case brought by a group of corporations that filed an antitrust suit against the major players in the potash industry, ruling that plaintiffs failed to allege specific facts sufficient to plead a plausible “direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable” connection between the alleged foreign anticompetitive activity and the domestic potash market. As the Foreign Trade and Antitrust Improvements Act (“FTAIA” or “Act”) develops through case law, antitrust lawyers and academics hoped that this latest case, Minn-Chem Inc. v. Agrium Inc., would provide more guidance in interpreting the Act’s three-step test. However, it seems that this case spurred more questions than answers.
The FTAIA limits enforcement of U.S. antitrust laws in situations where there are no clear effects on U.S. consumers. The Act aims to regulate foreign trade or commerce with foreign nations via a three-step test: (1) Did the conduct involve U.S. import trade or import commerce? (2) If not, does the conduct involve trade with foreign nations? and (3) If the conduct involves trade with foreign nations, does it have a “direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect” on the U.S. market?
On October 21, 2011, the DOJ Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) filed a civil lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. to prevent Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V. and BBU Inc. (collectively, “BBU”) from acquiring Sara Lee Corporation’s (“Sara Lee”) North American Fresh Bakery business. The DOJ simultaneously filed a Proposed Final Judgment, reflecting a settlement with BBU and Sara Lee upon which they agreed to divestitures of certain sliced bread brands and associated assets in select areas where the two companies compete head-to-head in order to proceed with the acquisition. Such divestitures would resolve competitive concerns alleged in the suit.
Continue reading "DOJ Settles With Grupo Bimbo on Sara Lee Acquisition" »
On June 14, 2011, the European Court of Justice decided that EU law allows third parties, who are suing cartel members for money damages, access to information and evidence gathered in criminal antitrust investigations. The decision may mean the end for leniency procedures, now that cartel members looking for a way out are faced with potential disclosure of the often incriminating information they provide the competition authorities.
Continue reading "When Private Enforcement Meets Leniency" »
On July 7, 2011, the FTC and DOJ (the “Agencies”) announced the final revisions to the Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) Premerger Notification Rules and the Premerger Notification and Report Form. The changes were made to reduce the filing burden and streamline the form parties must file when seeking antitrust clearance of proposed mergers and acquisitions under the HSR Act and the Premerger Notification Rules.
Continue reading "An Overview of the Amendments to the HSR Form" »
On June 6, 2011, the US District Court for the District of Columbia denied defendant H&R Block’s motion to transfer venue. The district court ruled that H&R Block failed to meet their burden to show that a transfer of this case to the Western District of Missouri is warranted in the interests of justice.
Continue reading "Local Price Cutting Keeps Merger Case in DC" »
