Antitrust Lawyer Blog Commentary on Current Developments

Articles Posted in FCC Antitrust Highlights

Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. are the only two corporations authorized by the Commission to provide satellite radio service in the United States. On March 20, 2007 they submitted an application to the FCC requesting permission to combine into a single entity. Each entity would own half of the company, and the equity ownership would be divided evenly between the shareholders of both corporations.

The National Association of Broadcasters is just one of many political forces urging policymakers to reject the deal calling it an “anti-consumer proposal”. The trade group also stated that “given the government’s history of opposing monopolies in all forms, NAB would be shocked if federal regulators permitted a merger of XM and Sirius.” The numerous groups that are strongly opposed to the merger fear that if approved it would only hurt the consumer.

On the other hand analyst Robert Peck of Bear Stearns is forecasting that the merger will be approved. According to Radio Ink, Peck wrote that XM/Sirius possesses many arguments as to the benefits it will have to society. Peck also stated that the FCC is likely to approve the merger if they pay close attention to the merits of the deal.

The FCC finally approved AT&T Inc.’s (“AT&T) merger with BellSouth Corp. (“BellSouth”) late on December 29, with the telephone companies agreeing to several conditions, including a controversial network neutrality provision aimed at protecting Web players such as Microsoft and Google. AT&T was eager to close the $80 billion-plus deal for several months. FCC approval was the last hurdle facing the merger. AT&T was forced to yield on network neutrality because FCC Democrats Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein insisted on protecting Internet-based providers of data, video, and applications from potential anticompetitive harms. Because four FCC members voted – Republican Robert McDowell did not participate – Copps and Adelstein held a veto over the deal.

In an 11-page letter made public Thursday night, AT&T said it would “maintain a neutral network and neutral routing in its wireline broadband Internet access service.” In terms of definitional substance, AT&T said it would not offer “any service that privileges, degrades or prioritizes any packet transmitted … based on source, ownership or destination.” The two-year pledge, AT&T added, would not apply to its IPTV networks or to managed IP networks on behalf of large business customers. The commitments also go away if Congress passes a net neutrality law within two years. In other concessions, AT&T promised to sell DSL service for $19.99 a month on a standalone basis, meaning the consumer would not need to buy “circuit switched voice grade telephone service” at the same time. The 30-month commitment, by its terms, would not prevent AT&T from conditioning the DSL purchase on the purchase of some other service, such as pay-TV or mobile phone service.

For more information contact:

Local governments will have 90 days to act on cable-franchise applications filed by AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications and other entities with existing rights to access city-owned conduits, the FCC ruled in an action on December 20 that split the agency along partisan lines. With support from major phone firms, FCC chairman Kevin Martin championed franchise reform as his proclaimed antidote for rising nominal cable rates and for spurring deployment of high-speed Internet-access facilities across the country. Because cable incumbents were not granted similar 90-day guarantees, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (“NCTA”) called the FCC vote a rejection of a “level playing field” among cable providers.

Needing more time to evaluate the FCC’s order in full, NCTA president Kyle McSlarrow declined to promise that the trade group would take the agency to court. While fellow Republicans Deborah Taylor Tate and Robert McDowell backed Martin, Democrats Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein refused to go along, claiming that the Commission was on shaky legal ground in thinking that it could boss thousands of cities and towns on how to charter new cable entrants. The new franchise rules are expected to take legal effect early next year.

For more information contact:

To circumvent federal limits on radio ownership, investors trying to buy industry giant Clear Channel Communications Inc. (“Clear Channel”) plan to become passive owners in some radio stations they already own and divest others. According to their merger application submitted Friday, December 15, to the FCC, Thomas H. Lee Partners LP (“Lee”) and Bain Capital LLC (“Bain”) plan to insulate their interests in other radio companies in which they have a stake to avoid violating the agency’s limits on how many stations one company can own in a single market.

The FCC sets such limits by market size. A company may own no more than eight stations in the largest U.S. markets, such as Los Angeles, New York and Chicago, where at least 45 full-power radio stations operate. As markets get smaller, so do the number of stations a single owner may hold. Both Lee and Bain already have substantial radio investments that conflict with the FCC’s rules. Lee participated in a consortium of companies that acquired Univision Communications Inc. (“Univision”) for $13.7 billion in June through an entity called Broadcast Media Partners. Both Lee and Bain also have an interest in radio company Cumulus Media Inc. (“Cumulus”).

Clear Channel announced on November 16, that Lee and Bain will take a big portion of the company to help founder Lowry Mays and his family take the publicly traded company private for $26.7 billion. The Mays will invest with the buyout firms and remain involved in company operations. Clear Channel also plans to divest 448 radio stations in smaller cities and rural areas. The buyout shops do not specify what steps they will take to become passive owners in Univision and Cumulus, but telecommunications industry lawyers said one option could be stopping their participation in programming and management decisions. They are also likely to remove their representatives from the Univision and Cumulus boards and change any voting stock holdings to nonvoting.

In a November 27 filing with the FCC, Cablevision Systems (“Cablevision”) said the agency’s rule banning set-top boxes with integrated security functions should not require the operator to deploy CableCARD-based boxes because all of its digital set-tops already contain removable smart cards. In the filing, Cablevision requested a limited waiver of the July 1, 2007, integration ban because the company, “alone among the nation’s cable operators, already has deployed set-top boxes that use separable, removable security on smart cards.”

Cablevision “seeks either a clarification that navigation devices with separate security on removable smart cards are not ‘integrated devices’ for purposes of the integration ban or a waiver that will allow such devices to continue to be placed into service after July 1, 2007,” it said in the filing with the FCC. The FCC’s rule requires new set-top boxes deployed by cable operators as of July 1 to separate the functions for accessing TV services. The cable industry continues to lobby against the ban, drawing support this week from three Republican congressional leaders. The ban, enacted via the 1996 Telecommunications Act, is supposed to ensure that third-party consumer-electronics devices work within cable operators’ networks – using the Cable Television Laboratories-developed CableCARD hardware – by requiring cable operators to use the same standards themselves. Cablevision said it uses proprietary removable smart cards, developed with NDS Group (“NDS”), for security functions in all of its approximately 6 million digital set-top boxes in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut systems.

The NDS-developed smart cards, which look like credit cards, can also plug into a Cablevision-supplied CableCARD. That card can, in turn, be inserted into the CableCARD slot on any CableCARD-ready device, according to Cablevision. As of the second quarter of 2006, more than 12,000 customers were using Cablevision-supplied CableCARDs, the company claimed. Cablevision said that permitting it to meet the requirement of the integration ban by continuing to deploy smart-card-capable boxes “will not affect Cablevision’s continued support of CableCARDs for third-party, CableCARD-ready [consumer-electronics] devices and will not adversely impact customers’ experience with such CableCARDs.” The filing was signed by Michael Olsen, Cablevision’s vice president of legal and regulatory affairs, and was certified by James Blackley, the operator’s senior VP of corporate engineering and technology.

On November 16, Guidance Software Inc. agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that its failure to take reasonable security measures to protect sensitive customer data contradicted security promises made on its Web site and violated federal law. According to the FTC, Guidance’s data-security failure allowed hackers to access sensitive credit card information for thousands of consumers. The settlement will require the company to implement a comprehensive information-security program and obtain audits by an independent third-party security professional every other year for 10 years.
Guidance sells software and related training, materials, and services customers use to investigate and respond to computer breaches and other security incidents. According to the FTC complaint, Guidance failed to implement simple, inexpensive and readily available security measures to protect consumers’ data. In contrast to claims about data security made on Guidance’s Web site, the company created unnecessary risks to credit card information by permanently storing it in clear readable text. In addition, the complaint alleges that Guidance failed to protect the information by:

On November 16, the Senate voted unanimously to confirm FCC chairman Kevin Martin to a second five-year term, according to the office of Senate Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). Martin was nominated by President George W. Bush to a Republican seat on the Commission and sworn in on July 3, 2001. Bush named him chairman on March 18, 2005.
For more information contact:

Olev Jaakson at ojaakson@dbmlawgroup.com.

The DOJ announced on October 31st that it suspended its investigation of Entercom Communications Corporation’s proposed $262 million acquisition of Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, and New York radio stations from CBS Corporation as long as the companies sell three Rochester radio stations. Entercom informed the DOJ that it planned to divest the three Rochester stations in order to avoid the need for further investigation and to comply with the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) local ownership rules.

The Antitrust Division focused its investigation on the Rochester area in which Entercom already owns four radio stations-¬one AM and three FM-¬and would acquire four additional FM stations from CBS. The DOJ investigated whether Entercom’s ownership of eight radio stations in the Rochester area, accounting for more than 57 percent of radio advertising revenue, reduced competition and raised the price of radio advertising in that market.

The FCC’s local ownership rules prohibit Entercom from owning more than five FM stations in one area and require Entercom to sell two stations. Prior to the conclusion of the DOJ’s investigation, Entercom said that it planned to sell CBS’s WRMM-FM and WZNE-FM and Entercom’s WFKL-FM to a third party. The DOJ determined that this sale would reduce Entercom’s post-transaction share of Rochester radio advertising revenues to about 40 percent. Based on the reduced share of revenue and the characteristics of the radio stations being sold, the DOJ concluded that it would not have reason to continue its investigation.

On October 12, the FCC released a Notice of Inquiry for its Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, as required by Congress. The Notice of Inquiry, which seeks comment and information on competition in the video programming market, is designed to assist the FCC with its annual Video Competition Report.

In the annual Video Competition Report, the FCC expects to report on changes in the competitive environment over the last year. The Notice seeks information that will allow the FCC to evaluate the status of competition in the video marketplace, changes in the market since the 2005 Video Competition Report, prospects for new entrants, factors that have facilitated or impeded competition, and the effect these factors are having on consumers’ access to video programming.

The Notice solicits comment and information on video programming distributors, including cable systems, direct broadcast satellite services, large home satellite dish providers, broadband service providers, private cable operators, also called satellite master antenna television systems, open video systems, wireless cable systems using frequencies in the broadband radio and educational broadband services, local exchange carrier systems, utility-operated systems, commercial mobile radio services and other wireless providers, and over-the-air broadcast television stations. In addition, the FCC seeks information on video programming distributed over the Internet and via Internet Protocol networks, as well as that disseminated through home video sales and rentals.

On October 6, the FCC ended its investigation into Time Warner Cable’s (“Time Warner”) decision in August to drop the NFL Network without providing appropriate notice to subscribers. The FCC reached a consent decree in which Time Warner agreed that it violated an FCC rule that requires cable operators to provide customers 30 days notice before deleting a channel. The agency said it would take no action against Time Warner and closed the investigation. NFL Network complained to the FCC after Time Warner dropped the sports channel on some newly acquired systems from Comcast and Adelphia Communications.
For more information contact:

Olev Jaakson at ojaakson@dbmlawgroup.com.

Contact Information