Articles :: Antitrust Lawyer Blog
June 2, 2008

DELAWARE JUDGE UNSEALS COMPLAINT AGAINST YAHOO’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS

On June 2, 2008 Chancellor William B. Chandler III of Delaware decided to unseal the complaint in a case brought by two pension fund shareholder groups against Yahoo and its Board of Directors. The plaintiffs accused the Yahoo Board of Directors, especially CEO Jerry Yang, of violating their fiduciary duties and enacting barriers such as a severance package for employees to thwart an acquisition by Microsoft.

Continue reading "DELAWARE JUDGE UNSEALS COMPLAINT AGAINST YAHOO’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS" »

October 1, 2007

GERMAN FEDERAL SUPREME COURT REFERS THE BKARTA’S SPRINGER/PROSIEBEN-SAT1 MERGER PROHIBITIONDECISION BACK TO THE HIGHER REGIONAL COURT DÜSSELDORF

In a recent judgment dated September 30, 2007, the Federal Supreme Court held that even after parties abandon their merger plans due to a prohibition decision by the German Federal Cartel Office ("BKartA"), German courts hold jurisdiction to rule on the question as to whether the BKartA was right to prohibit the proposed merger. The parties do, however, need to demonstrate a special interest in such a court review. The Federal Supreme Court acknowledged that such an interest arises in particular if the purchaser is likely to be confronted with similar arguments by the BKartA that led to the relevant prohibition when notifying potential future acquisitions.

Continue reading "GERMAN FEDERAL SUPREME COURT REFERS THE BKARTA’S SPRINGER/PROSIEBEN-SAT1 MERGER PROHIBITIONDECISION BACK TO THE HIGHER REGIONAL COURT DÜSSELDORF" »

September 17, 2007

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ESSENTIALLY UPHOLDS THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S DECISION AND FINDS THAT MICROSOFT ABUSED ITS DOMINANT POSITION

In a ruling released on September 17, 2007, the Court of First Instance (the “Court”), the second highest court in Europe, reaffirmed the European Commission’s (“EC”) 2004 decision that Microsoft abused its market power by tying its digital media player to the Windows operating system. By bundling these products together, Microsoft undercut existing competition in the digital media player market and created an anticompetitive market structure. The Court upheld nearly all the key points the 2004 EC decision and, in doing so, delivered a stinging rebuke to Microsoft. The Court’s ruling stated that the EC’s standard of interoperability between the Windows operating system and alternative digital media players was well conceived and that there is no inconsistency between that degree of interoperability and the remedy imposed by the EC.

The Court also upheld the EC directive to share confidential computer code with Microsoft’s competitors, a ruling that contains possible ramifications on other companies that possess market dominance in various software markets. The Court went on to declare that the EUR 497 million ($690 million) fine levied against Microsoft shall stand as is.

Continue reading "THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ESSENTIALLY UPHOLDS THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S DECISION AND FINDS THAT MICROSOFT ABUSED ITS DOMINANT POSITION" »

August 7, 2007

CFIUS Reform

On July, 25 President Bush signed a bill that will reinforce the review process of foreign acquisitions in the United States, and secure an open environment for foreign investment that is critical to the U.S. economy. The final law does not alter the review period of the first and second stages of the process, and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ("CFIUS") is now allowed to impose fines or, in the most severe cases, reopen reviews for material noncompliance with a mitigation agreement. Under the new law, CFIUS is required to provide Congress with detailed reports after the completion of investigations and reviews, and to consider an expanded list of factors in its national security review. These factors include the risk of technology transfer to a country that is a threat to the United States and the risks associated with foreign investment in critical infrastructure. These are just some of the most significant changes made to the process.

Continue reading "CFIUS Reform" »

June 26, 2007

JAPANESE ADVISORY PANEL ISSUES RECOMENDATIONS

On June 26, 2007 the Japanese Government’s Advisory Panel on Basic Issues Regarding the Anti-Monopoly Act (“the Panel”) concluded its series of roundtable discussions. Since 2005, the Panel has met in order to discuss and update the Act Concerning Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade. The Panel was directed by the Chief Cabinet Secretary and heard testimony from a wide range of experts and concerned citizens. The statement issued by the Panel, and summarized below, is the culmination of these meetings.

Continue reading "JAPANESE ADVISORY PANEL ISSUES RECOMENDATIONS" »

October 23, 2006

What Is Confession Good for Now?

Andre P. Barlow's most recent published article is now available on the Legal Times website. To read it, please visit: http://www.law.com/jsp/dc/PubArticleDC.jsp?id=1161075916475&hub=Commentary

August 1, 2006

FTC Testifies on Barriers to the Entry of Generic Drugs

Testifying on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) before the U.S. Senate’s Special Committee on Aging, Commissioner Jon Leibowitz described the FTC’s work in the area of branded and generic pharmaceutical competition and discussed barriers that can lead to the delay of generic entry into the U.S. marketplace.

Continue reading "FTC Testifies on Barriers to the Entry of Generic Drugs" »

July 18, 2006

Upfront Buyer and No Upfront Buyer Required in Linde/BOC

On July 18, the FTC announced that it reached a settlement that would allow Linde AG’s acquisition of the BOC Group to proceed. As is typical in merger reviews, the FTC staff focused on specific product overlaps to determine what assets needed to be divested to resolve the antitrust concerns. The Commission approved the merger so long as the companies divest two groups of assets: (1) liquid oxygen and liquid nitrogen and (2) bulk refined helium. The divestitures are required to satisfy the FTC that competition will not be harmed following the transaction. That being said, an up front buyer was required for one set of assets, while an upfront buyer was not required for the other. The consent order states that Linde will have to find FTC-approved buyer for the liquid oxygen and liquid nitrogen assets within six months, however, the FTC required Linde to divest the bulk refined helium assets to an upfront buyer, Nippon Sanso.

Continue reading "Upfront Buyer and No Upfront Buyer Required in Linde/BOC" »

July 7, 2006

FTC Continues to Challenge Consummated Mergers

On July 7, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) challenged Hologic Inc.’s 2005 purchase of Fischer Imaging Corporation’s breast cancer screening and diagnosis business. Hologic closed its $32 million transaction without reporting it to the FTC because Hologic’s acquisition of Fischer’s assets was not reportable under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Premerger Notification Act (“HSR Act”), as it was valued at less than the current $56.7 million filing threshold. Accordingly, the FTC did not have an opportunity to investigate the deal before the parties consummated the transaction.

Continue reading "FTC Continues to Challenge Consummated Mergers" »

June 27, 2006

Supreme Court Will Hear Telecommunication Collusion Case

On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments from Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T Inc., BellSouth Corp., and Qwest Communications International, Inc. in a case that may either help companies' efforts to fight off antitrust law suits, or promote consumers challenges to what appears to be illegal coordination of activities by competing companies in concentrated markets that keep prices high.

Continue reading "Supreme Court Will Hear Telecommunication Collusion Case" »

June 26, 2006

Supreme Court Rejects FTC’s Petition to Overturn Schering-Plough Decision Relating to Reverse Payments to Generics

On June 26, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) appeal of the Eleventh Circuit’s decision that Schering-Plough Corp. (“Schering”) legally paid two generic drug competitors to stay out of the market as part of a settlement to patent litigation. In the past, the FTC has taken a consistently aggressive approach that a money payment from a branded drug company to a generic company that delays the entry of a generic version of a branded drug is illegal.

Continue reading "Supreme Court Rejects FTC’s Petition to Overturn Schering-Plough Decision Relating to Reverse Payments to Generics" »

April 14, 2006

Jumping the HSR Gun Is Costly for Qualcomm

On April 14, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division (“Antitrust Division”) announced a $1.8 million civil settlement against merger partners Qualcomm and Flarion Technologies alleging “gun-jumping” violations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”). The action underscores the Antitrust Division’s resolve to vigorously scrutinize the conduct of merging parties prior to consummation of the transaction.

Continue reading "Jumping the HSR Gun Is Costly for Qualcomm" »